The persistent attempt by Mr. Julius Abure to parade himself as the National Chairman of the Labour Party and to recently announce some candidates in his purported primary elections under the platform of the Labour Party has become not only legally indefensible but a direct assault on the rule of law and the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic process.

The issue of the leadership of the Labour Party has already been conclusively determined by the courts, culminating in the decision of the Supreme Court, which made it abundantly clear that the tenure of Julius Abure and his executive had since expired. The apex court recognized the caretaker leadership that emerged to stabilize the party and restore order. In particular, the leadership under Senator Nenadi Usman was acknowledged as the legitimate authority steering the affairs of the party pending a proper convention.

Ordinarily, in a country governed by law, that should have ended the matter.
However, rather than submit to the finality of judicial pronouncements as demanded by the Constitution and democratic norms, Mr. Abure chose the dangerous route of forum shopping and judicial adventurism. He returned to the trial court in a desperate bid to revive a dead mandate. The courts, both at the trial level and at the Court of Appeal, reportedly made it clear to him that the matter had been settled and that peace should be allowed to reign within the party.

Yet, in complete disregard of these judicial pronouncements, Mr. Abure has continued to act as though he remains the authentic leader of the Labour Party. Most astonishing is his purported organization of parallel primaries and the presentation of candidates for elections under the party’s platform, despite the fact that the Labour Party has since held a valid national convention where Senator Nenadi Usman was affirmed as the substantive National Chairman alongside other duly elected executives.
This conduct is not merely provocative; it is profoundly dangerous to constitutional democracy.

A political party is not a lawless association where individuals can operate according to personal whims. It is an institution regulated by the Constitution, the Electoral Act, the party’s constitution, and the decisions of competent courts. Once the courts have spoken with finality, every person, no matter how highly placed, is bound to obey.

The attempt to run a parallel structure after lawful leadership has emerged amounts to political mischief of the highest order. It creates confusion among party members, deceives unsuspecting aspirants and supporters, and undermines the credibility of the electoral system. Worse still, it exposes innocent candidates to avoidable legal disasters, as candidates presented by unauthorized persons or unlawful structures may ultimately find their nominations invalidated by the courts.

One must ask: what exactly is the objective of this persistent defiance by Mr. Abure? No democracy can thrive where individuals place themselves above the law. Nigeria cannot afford to become a laughing stock before the international community because of the reckless conduct of politicians who refuse to accept lawful decisions. The sanctity of judicial pronouncements must be respected if democracy is to survive.

It is even more troubling that a legal practitioner would be associated with conduct that appears to undermine settled judicial decisions. Lawyers are ministers in the temple of justice and are expected to uphold the rule of law, not ridicule it through acts capable of bringing the legal profession into disrepute. The Rules of Professional Conduct impose a duty on lawyers to maintain respect for the courts and the administration of justice. Persistent disregard for binding decisions raises serious ethical and disciplinary concerns that the appropriate professional bodies may eventually need to examine.

The security agencies must not fold their arms while this avoidable confusion festers. Where an individual continues to impersonate authority, create parallel political structures, and generate tension capable of disrupting public peace and electoral order, the relevant authorities have a duty to intervene decisively within the bounds of the law. Enough is enough.

Nigeria must move away from the era where political actors behave as though the law is optional. Democracy survives on discipline, order, and respect for institutions. Once the courts have spoken, every patriotic citizen ought to bow to the supremacy of the law.

Mr. Abure must therefore desist from further acts capable of misleading the public, deceiving unsuspecting aspirants, and destabilizing the Labour Party. Any continued attempt to unlawfully parade himself as Chairman of the party or present candidates under an illegal structure may amount not only to political fraud on innocent party members and supporters, but also a deliberate misrepresentation capable of attracting serious legal consequences.

Members of the public, aspirants, and political stakeholders are therefore strongly advised to exercise caution and avoid dealing with unauthorized persons or factions whose actions are clearly contrary to established judicial pronouncements and the lawful leadership of the party.
The time has come for all genuine stakeholders to rally around lawful authority, obey court decisions, and allow peace, order, and internal democracy to flourish within the party and the nation at large.

M.O. Ubani, SAN
Legal Practitioner and Public Affairs Commentator.

Former Abia State Commissioner for Trade and Investment, Chief John Okiyi Kalu, popularly known as “JOK,” has formally declared his intention to contest the 2027 governorship election in Abia State.

Chief Okiyi Kalu, who previously served as Commissioner for Information and later as Commissioner for Trade and Investment under former Governor Okezie Ikpeazu, is expected to seek the ticket of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

The Abiriba-born politician from Ohafia Local Government Area is banking on strong grassroots support, particularly from young party members and a growing bloc within the PDP in Abia State, as he positions himself to clinch the party’s governorship ticket.

Chief Okiyi Kalu is currently at the PDP screening venue, a development that further confirms his active participation in the race.

Sources close to the former commissioner disclosed that he is leveraging his experience in public service and widespread acceptability across the state to mount a formidable challenge for the exalted position.

Honourable Justice Chinemeze Uchenna, popularly known as “Shasha,” has declared his intention to contest for the Abia State House of Assembly under the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), while strongly criticizing what he described as the prolonged political marginalization of Ukwa people within the Abia South Senatorial District.

Speaking during an interaction with supporters and party faithful, the PDP aspirant from Ukwa West Ward in Ukwa East Local Government Area said his decision to join the race was driven by the need to bring quality representation, fairness, and inclusive governance to his constituency and the state at large.

Uchenna pledged loyalty to the PDP leadership and vowed to work in line with the directives of the party’s National Working Committee (NWC), stressing that he remains a committed party man.

“My agenda is to make good laws for my people and the state at large, while supporting good governance at every level. I will continue to support my party and all its candidates in every election,” he stated.

The aspirant, however, expressed dissatisfaction with the political structure in Abia South Senatorial District, arguing that leadership positions, particularly the Senate seat, have been dominated for too long by one individual.

Without mincing words, Uchenna questioned why the people of Ukwa should continue to be sidelined despite having qualified individuals capable of representing the district at the National Assembly.

According to him, the Abia South Senatorial District was originally designed to reflect the interests of both Ukwa and Ngwa people, not to be controlled by a single bloc.

He referenced the zoning arrangement that previously produced former Senator Adolphus Wabara from Ukwa, noting that the same arrangement later returned Senator Enyinanaya Abaribe to the Senate in 2007.

“Ukwa has capable people who can represent the district at the Senate. We have produced influential leaders in the past, including a Senate President. This time, it is the turn of Ukwa to produce the Senator representing Abia South,” he declared.

Uchenna also took a swipe at Senator Abaribe’s long stay in the National Assembly, arguing that after nearly two decades in office, the district deserved a fresh direction and new leadership.

He alleged that the people of Ukwa have been politically marginalized over the years and maintained that the time had come for equity and fairness to prevail.

Using a biblical analogy, the PDP aspirant likened the current political situation to the story of Prophet Elijah, who thought he was the only prophet left in Israel until God revealed that many others still existed.

“People believed Abaribe was the only political figure capable of representing the district, but today there are many competent individuals in Ukwa who can also serve effectively,” he said.

On his plans for his constituency if elected into the Abia State House of Assembly, Uchenna promised to attract government presence and social amenities to his people while maintaining a cordial working relationship with the executive arm of government and party leadership.

He assured constituents that his administration would be inclusive and people-oriented.

“My people know me very well. They call me Shasha, meaning ‘a man of plenty.’ If given the opportunity, I will bring plenty of development and ensure everyone is carried along,” he stated.

Addressing the issue of political imbalance between Ukwa and Ngwa communities, Uchenna appealed for unity and fairness, insisting that political rights should not be determined solely by population strength.

He emphasized the need for leaders across the district to recognize the importance of balance, inclusion, and respect for all constituent groups within the senatorial zone.