The burial ceremony of late Capt. Fred Nnamdi Stephen, who was born on July 25, 1964, drew family members, friends, associates and sympathisers from different walks of life to Illah in Oshimili North Local Government Area of Delta State, where he was laid to rest.

Among those who attended the funeral was the Senior Pastor of Oldtime Christians Church, Umuahia, Abia State, Pastor Alozie Onyebuchi, who was accompanied by the Assistant Pastor and several members of the church to sympathise with the family of the deceased, particularly his sister, Mrs. Susan Chinonyerem Stephen, wife of the late captain.

Speaking during the funeral ceremony, Pastor Alozie paid a glowing tribute to the late Capt. Fred Nnamdi Stephen, describing him as a kindhearted and compassionate man who lived a life worthy of emulation.

According to the Pastor, the deceased was an accommodating and loving individual who never discriminated against people, irrespective of their background or status. He noted that the late Capt. Fred was a peace loving man whose generosity and good nature endeared him to many.

“He was a man with a large heart, someone who embraced everyone and treated people with love and respect. He was the type of person every family would be proud to have because of his selfless and caring disposition,” the pastor said.

Pastor Alozie also used the occasion to encourage his sister, Mrs. Susan Chinonyerem Stephen, urging her to remain strong in the face of the painful loss. He assured her of his continuous support, both spiritually and otherwise, and pledged that she and the entire family would not be left alone during this difficult period.

He further offered prayers for the bereaved family, committing their affairs into the hands of God and asking for divine comfort, strength and guidance for all those left behind.

The funeral ceremony witnessed the presence of dignitaries, relatives, friends and well wishers who gathered to honour the memory of the late Capt. Fred Nnamdi Stephen and celebrate a life remembered for love, humility and service to humanity.

The recent renewed call for a single six-year tenure for Nigeria’s President and Governors has reignited once again an important constitutional debate.

The central argument of proponents like Distinguished Senator Opeyemi Bamidele and his colleagues is straightforward: a Chief Executive who is not seeking re-election will be less distracted by politics and more focused on governance.

This proposition has some appeal and merit. Under the current constitutional arrangement, Presidents and governors are elected for four years and may seek one additional term. In practice (like what is presently playing out) preparations for re-election often commence well before the expiration of the first term, creating political pressures that can influence policy choices. A single tenure no doubt, could potentially eliminate this concern and encourage long-term policy implementation.

However, it is not necessarily about administrative efficiency alone. Democracy is fundamentally built on accountability and good governance. The prospect of re-election serves as one of the most powerful mechanisms through which citizens evaluate governmental performance. Removing that incentive for appraisal may inadvertently weaken democratic responsiveness and accountability.

Comparative constitutional experience demonstrates that no direct correlation exists between the length of tenure and the quality of governance. Nations in American and North European continents with fixed and relatively short executive tenures have produced transformative leaders. Conversely, many countries in Africa that permitted lengthy periods in office have suffered from poor governance, institutional decay, and democratic erosion.

The Nigerian experience equally suggests that governance outcomes are influenced more by leadership quality and institutional effectiveness than by tenure duration. For me, strong institutions, respect for constitutional limits, transparency, and adherence to the rule of law remain the primary determinants of governmental success.

From a constitutional perspective, therefore, our debate should not be framed as a choice between six years and eight years alone. Rather, an exhaustive inquiry should focus on which arrangement best promotes accountability, stability, effective governance, and democratic development.

We all agree that a constitutional amendment introducing a six-year single tenure is legally feasible in Nigeria if it follows the amendment procedures prescribed by the Constitution. The more important question, however, is whether such a change would address the underlying challenges of governance in Nigeria.
The answer is likely nuanced. It is possible that tenure reform may alter political incentives, but it cannot substitute for competent leadership, institutional integrity, and citizen participation which we all crave for.

A good leader can achieve significant results within a limited tenure, while a poor leader may squander and ruin his or her country the more even when given an extended period in office.

The real challenge before Nigeria is therefore not simply how long a President or governor should remain in office, but how to ensure that whoever occupies the office governs effectively with attendant dividends of democracy, responsibly, and in accordance with constitutional principles. That objective remains the true measure of a dream of a democratic success.

Dr M.O. Ubani SAN
Legal Practitioner/Policy Analyst.

The Abia State Commissioner of Police, CP Danladi Isa, on 25th September 2024 led a working tour to Ohafia Area Command and its respective divisions. He also visited Igbere, Uzuakoli Division and officers of Operation Crush Team stationed along Uzuakoli Road.

In his lecture to the officers, the CP shared his observations from the assessment of their environment.

He charged officers to remain vigilant and maintain professionalism while carrying out their constitutional duties.

CP Danladi emphasized the importance of collaboration with stakeholders and community policing

He encouraged officers to be civil with members of the public, avoid all forms of corrupt practices, and promote a positive image of the Police Force in the state.